I have configured my Mac to dual-boot with Linux. When I turn my computer on I can choose to enter the Linux operating system or Mac OS X.
Having gone through this process, I would now suggest against it.
Most folks who run linux on a desktop only run the one operating system on the computer and don’t dual-boot. If you configure a Mac for dual-boot, you are the exceptional use-case in the Linux community.
If you want to learn to ride a bike, would you buy a pennyfarthing? I’d guess not. Most likely you would get the common bike design of today, the safety bicycle. If you ride a pennyfarthing in 2016, you are an exceptional use-case. Your friends don’t ride pennyfarthings so you can’t share riding tips with them and benefit from theirs. Bike shops don’t have the know-how to repair it. Drivers may not understand how to drive safely around your contraption of antiquity.
When you are the exceptional use-case, you don’t benefit from network effect. When you are the common use-case, answers to your problems are quick to find.
Here is what sucks:
I just bought a ThinkPad X200, which is a $150 laptop that can run 100% free software. I’ll install GNU-linux on it. The X200 with Libreboot pre-installed is one of three laptops that are certified by the Free Software Foundation (basically Richard Stallman). More soon!
Update (August 4th 2016): Turns out installing Libreboot is very hard. I’ll stick with an un-free BIOS until I’ve met someone else who’s installed it.
I like writing and I mainly do it in private. Just in the month of July I’ve created 83 “notes” in my Evernote account, which I use in a lot of different contexts. I note-take in meetings at work, I write Dear Diary-style personal entries, and throw notable educational videos (the note here was “always get the bigger pizza?”). Evernote has basically been my life’s junk drawer.
There’s two main things Evernote does well: It syncs all my content to *~the cloud~* so I can access it at work, home and the in-between, and it works while I’m in the subway, syncing when I have service again.
This has been a lovely relationship with an app until Evernote decided to change their subscription model, limiting users that don’t pay (including yours truly) to use on two devices. 😑
I will leave the Evernote for Pad, an in-browser note editor I made earlier this week. It is a work in progress (you can’t even delete a “note” yet!), but it is marginally usable now. Try it out, but don’t count on it until I release version 1.0.
Pad is free now and will always be free for any use. It’s free as in free software available on Github, as well as free as in you don’t owe me anything.
I’m going to steal two things from Evernote, their best features: syncing to the cloud and offline use.
Currently data is stored in your web browser, indefinitely, unless you clear your “Local Storage.” I will never get access to your data since it is “local.” There’s no remote server that Pad relies on for saving your data. We can try to save data to arbitrary data stores (e.g. Amazon S3 or in your Github Gists). If your data is in a private place in *~the cloud~* then you could use Pad on any of your devices 😎
Pad could work offline too, through the magic of which Progressive Web Apps.
I binge-watched the entirety of ESPN’s new documentary series on O.J. Simpson over Fourth of July weekend. It is eight hours long and it is stunning.
As an 8 year-old during the O.J. murder trial in 1994-95, I had no idea what was going on. My attention was probably on beating Super Metroid. I didn’t know O.J. held the single season rushing yards record, that he was a major black icon of the 70s and 80s, or the details of his trial, so this is a good history lesson.
The central tension in the murder case is that the evidence that proved he was guilty beyond any doubt, yet he is acquitted. They found Nicole Simpson’s blood in O.J.’s white bronco. O.J. owned the shoes that matched bloody footprints at the crime scene, of which there were only 200 pairs made. How could the jury have acquitted him?
Other factors made for an involved case. O.J. assembled a legal “Dream Team” which included Johnny Cochran and Robert Kardashian, costing him $50k a day. During the trial, the D.A. was clever enough to have O.J. to try on the bloody glove found in his backyard. It didn’t fit. The cop who found that bloody glove? He turned out to be a racist bigot, leading the public to suspect a conspiracy with racial motivations were behind the case.
It seems like a poorly executed prosecution on top of sloppy police work. But then you hear one of the juror’s from the predominantly black jury explain her decision: this was her own payback for Rodney King, a victim of police brutality in L.A. a few years earlier. Cops get off all the time for using excessive force against and killing innocent black persons. She wanted to make sure that a black man would win in the trial of the century. As a member of a group endlessly oppressed by this criminal justice system, why would she vote any other way?